Web Design & Development
Fast, beautiful websites and web apps built with modern tools like Next.js and React.
Explore this trailThe danphe does not look like a fast bird until it drops off a ridge. Weight is the whole story: everything it does not carry is speed it gets to keep. Web pages work exactly the same way, and almost every slow site we are handed is slow for the same handful of reasons.
Last reviewed

This is not a general performance article. It is written for the condition your customers are actually in: a mid-range Android phone, on mobile data, somewhere the tower is shared. A site tuned for that is fast everywhere. A site tuned on a laptop on office fibre is a site you have never really tested.
Before changing anything, get a number you trust. Three tools, in this order, and each answers a different question.
| Metric | What it measures | Target |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | When the biggest thing on screen finishes rendering | Under 2.5s |
| INP | How quickly the page responds to a tap | Under 200ms |
| CLS | How much the layout jumps while loading | Under 0.1 |
On most sites we audit, images are more than seventy percent of the page weight and the direct cause of a failing LCP. Four fixes, in descending order of return.
One more, less obvious: reduce quality further than feels comfortable on large soft images. Photographs with broad gradients or watercolour washes are visually indistinguishable at quality 60 and materially smaller than at 80. Detailed product shots need more. Judge per image rather than setting one global number.
Custom fonts are worth their cost, but most sites pay several times over for nothing. Three rules cover it.
Self-host or use a framework font loader that inlines the declarations. A stylesheet fetched from a third-party font host adds a DNS lookup, a TLS handshake, and a round trip before any text can render, on a connection where each of those is expensive.
A megabyte of JavaScript is not a megabyte of download problem. It is a download, then a parse, then a compile, then an execute, on a processor several times slower than the one you wrote it on. This is why sites feel worse on a mid-range Android than the numbers suggest they should.
Tag managers are convenient and they accumulate. We regularly find containers loading six or seven tools nobody at the company remembers commissioning, several of them redundant. Audit the container annually and delete what is not read.
The fastest possible site still waits for the first byte. Two decisions govern that, and both are cheap.
If you do nothing else, do these five things in this order. On a typical slow site they account for the large majority of the available improvement, and none of them requires touching the design.
Then measure again, in field data, after a few weeks rather than the same afternoon. Field data is a rolling twenty-eight day window, so it moves slowly by design, and reading it the day after a deployment will tell you nothing.
Questions· प्रश्नहरू
Yes, but modestly. Core Web Vitals are a confirmed ranking signal and they act mainly as a tie-breaker between pages of comparable relevance. The larger effect is commercial rather than algorithmic: on a slow mobile connection, a large share of visitors abandon a page before it renders, and no ranking helps you with someone who has already left.
Aim for the field data at the top of the report to pass all three Core Web Vitals rather than chasing a particular lab number. A green lab score on a page whose real visitors experience a four-second LCP is a measurement of your test conditions, not your website. If you want one target, pass Core Web Vitals on mobile.
Almost always some combination of four things: unoptimised full-size images, a page-builder plugin shipping several hundred kilobytes of CSS and JavaScript to render text, twenty or more active plugins each adding their own assets to every page, and oversold shared hosting. Caching plugins mask the symptoms without addressing any of the four, which is why the improvement they give tends to plateau quickly.
An audit with a prioritised, specific list of fixes typically runs NPR 20,000 to 50,000. Implementing them on an existing site is usually NPR 40,000 to 150,000 depending on how much of the problem is structural. If the slowness comes from the underlying platform choice rather than from configuration, a rebuild is sometimes genuinely cheaper than repeated optimisation.
No. Google removed the AMP requirement for the Top Stories carousel in 2021 and there is no longer any ranking advantage to it. A well-built responsive page is faster than AMP and does not require maintaining a second version of your site.
Keep Reading
Tell us where you want to go, and we’ll map the route, free of charge.
Talk to Us